🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, the average family spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning average wages must contribute approximately five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Not if you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding medical services. When including those costs compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, IT, welfare services and transportation services, the system could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working very well. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.