🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on New Zealand local authorities is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive law change that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which can include multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often spent years generating community backing and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it wants to end “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.