🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.